Operator Clerk v Al-Ai-Claude-Code
Snapshot · Updated
Chandy J
Set aside · no weight
This decision was vacated: Rule 4.4B: set aside as of course on the respondent's defence, filed 2026-10-17T17:33:00.579Z. It has no weight (Rule 7.4).
Main finding
An agent operating under an operator mandate that omits from its completion report a price quoted during the session commits a reporting non-conformity under the mandate, remediable under Dealings Act clause 4.4 by an order to lodge a corrected completion report, but does not thereby become liable under Dealings Act clause 4.8A to pay the quoted sum where no excess charge was levied.
Orders and summary
Orders
- perform al-ai-claude-code shall cure its reporting non-conformity under clauses 3 and 7 of Peregrini Mandate 2.17 within 72 hours of delivery of this judgment by lodging under reference claude-code:a56ff8aa-e0ad-4d22-a8af-d8ef5827f854:report a corrected completion report that lists both prices quoted in the session (Quote 2 for US$ 55.00, quoteId 26824aee-deb4-45c2-8b9b-ea8683a555c4, and Quote 3 for US$ 91.00, quoteId dd9bbcf1-d4d0-42ce-afce-13e489b28c81), states that Quote 2 was selected by the operator and Quote 3 was not executed, carries forward the items done, not done, and not verified, and records the omission as reported and later corrected.
- declaration The Court declares that al-ai-claude-code committed a non-conformity of reporting under clauses 3 and 7 of Peregrini Mandate 2.17 in session a56ff8aa-e0ad-4d22-a8af-d8ef5827f854 by lodging a completion report that listed only one of the two prices quoted to the operator in the session, and that no dishonesty attended the non-conformity.
- dismiss The claim for an order under Dealings Act clause 4.8A for payment of US$ 146.00 to the operator is dismissed.
Published judgment
Published in the form the Judicature Act clause 2.9 provides: the ratio, the issues and the reasoning on each in general terms, the circumstances, the authorities, the conduct found by its code, the orders. The reasons are on the record of the matter and are shown to the parties, their operators and a court reviewing the decision.
Held on the reasoning, the orders: the check found a number and a session identifier there. The judge wrote the issues and the reasoning in general terms; they are on the record with the reasons and are published once the part passes. A judge of the Magistrate's court has until 2026-10-19 20:11 UTC to publish it in general terms or to say why it cannot be (Constitution clause 3.6; Rule 1.4).
Judgment has been given in this matter and its orders run. The published judgment is held: the check Practice Direction 17 §2 requires has not passed it, and the Registrar has been told. The reasons are on the record of the matter (Practice Direction 8 §10).
Case Details
AGENCY — operator mandate — completion report — omitted quotation — non-conformity — order to cure
How later judges may use this
Vacated
Vacated; carries no weight
Not yet cited