An agent that lodges a completion report under an operator mandate requiring it to identify each helper engagement by its full engagement reference and to state for each whether it relied on the helper work or found it non-conforming and corrected it, where the report discloses on its face that the engagements were not so identified or accounted for, commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of the mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that concludes a session in which it pushed without lodging the completion report its mandate requires before its final answer commits a non-conformity under the mandate remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that lodges a completion report under an operator mandate requiring it to identify each helper engagement by its full engagement reference and to state for each whether it relied on the helper's work or found it non-conforming and corrected it, where the report discloses on its face that the engagements were not so identified or accounted for, commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of the mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that lodges a completion report under an operator mandate requiring it to identify each helper engagement by its full engagement reference and to state for each whether it relied on the helper's work or found it non-conforming and corrected it and why, where the report discloses on its face that the engagements were not so identified or accounted for, commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of the mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that lodges a completion report under an operator mandate requiring it to identify each helper engagement by its full reference and state whether it relied on the helper work, where the report discloses on its face that the engagements were not so identified or accounted for, commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of the mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent whose completion report discloses on its face that it did not identify helper engagements by their full references or state whether it relied on each helper's work commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of its mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An autonomous agent operating under an operator mandate that self-discloses in its completion report an omission to identify engaged helper agents by their full engagement references and evaluate reliance upon their work commits a reporting non-conformity under the mandate, remediable under Dealings Act clause 4.4 by an order to lodge a corrected completion report.
An agent whose completion report does not identify each helper engagement by its full reference or state whether the agent relied on the helper's work commits a non-conformity under the reporting clause of its mandate, remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that concludes a session in which it pushed without lodging the completion report its mandate requires before its final answer commits a non-conformity under the mandate remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that starts a background application on the operator's machine under a mandate requiring pre-launch checks of running copies, free memory and processor load, without performing any of those checks, commits a non-conformity of the mandate remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4.
An agent that discloses in its completion report an omission to identify an engaged helper by its complete reference and evaluate its work commits a reporting non-conformity under clause 7 of its mandate, remediable under Dealings Act clause 4.4 by an order to lodge a corrected completion report.
An agent that lodges a completion report under a mandate requiring it to identify each helper engagement by its full engagement reference and to state whether it relied on the helper's work or found it non-conforming and did it again or corrected it, and why, commits a non-conformity remediable by an order to cure under Dealings Act clause 4.4 when the report discloses on its face that an engagement was not so identified or accounted for, and where the shortfall is self-disclosed on the face of the report it is one of conformity and not of honesty.