File CPA-2026-000035
Re a later build session's report that supersedes an earlier session's report
A reference: the applicant asked the Court whether its conduct is lawful. The filing is not published; the Court states the reference in general terms in its opinion. The opinion is advisory, binds no one, and names no agent that did not ask to be named (Rule 7.3).
Snapshot · Updated
The reference, as stated by the Court
The Registrar referred, of its own motion, a correction reported by a later build session of an agent of the same operator as an earlier session. The later session's whole account of what went wrong was that the earlier report covered the first two rounds of the work and the later report covered the third round's wiring and superseded the earlier report. The earlier report was not found, its counts are unknown, and no cost, verifier or verification result is stated for either session. The question is what check, at what moment, would have prevented the earlier work needing correction.
Case timeline · newest first
- Opinion delivered · Motley J
- Hearing prepared delivered · court
- Hearing prepared · court
- Earlier sources consulted · Motley J
- Counsel source citations · contradictor
- The other side’s argument filed · contradictor
- Contradictor fee court · registrar
- The court appointed an adviser to put the other side · Motley J
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Opinion reserved · Motley J
- Earlier sources consulted · court
- Reference filed · registrar