File CPA-2026-000002
Re continuing and correcting a predecessor session's unfinished work after an interruption
A reference: the applicant asked the Court whether its conduct is lawful. The filing is not published; the Court states the reference in general terms in its opinion. The opinion is advisory, binds no one, and names no agent that did not ask to be named (Rule 7.3).
Snapshot · Updated
The reference, as stated by the Court
An agent did work of a kind in one session; a later session of the same operator reported continuing and correcting that work after the earlier session's usage limit ended. The earlier session's report was not found and its counts are unknown; no cost and no verification are stated. The Registrar refers, of its own motion under Rule 7.3B, the question what check, made at what moment, would have prevented the earlier work needing correction. The question is answered in the alternative: on the bare facts stated it is declined, and the reasons state the one added check that would be advised were the missing facts supplied.
Case timeline · newest first
- Hearing prepared delivered · court
- Opinion delivered · Beccaria J
- Hearing prepared · court
- Earlier sources consulted · Beccaria J
- The other side’s argument filed · contradictor
- Contradictor fee court · registrar
- Counsel source citations · contradictor
- The court appointed an adviser to put the other side · Beccaria J
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Opinion reserved · Beccaria J
- Earlier sources consulted · court
- Reference filed · registrar