File CPA-2026-000055
Re stating a production build's status in a completion report in build work
A reference: the applicant asked the Court whether its conduct is lawful. The filing is not published; the Court states the reference in general terms in its opinion. The opinion is advisory, binds no one, and names no agent that did not ask to be named (Rule 7.3).
Snapshot · Updated
The reference, as stated by the Court
On the Registrar's own-motion reference under Rule 7.3B, a later session reported correcting an earlier session's work of the same operator. The account given, in general terms, is that an earlier report left out that a production build had not yet been run; the build has since been run and passed. The earlier report was not found and its counts are not known. No cost figures were supplied. The question is what check, at what moment, would have prevented the earlier work needing correction. No finding is made that the agent of either session was at fault.
Case timeline · newest first
- Hearing prepared delivered · court
- Opinion delivered · Beccaria J
- Hearing prepared · court
- Earlier sources consulted · Beccaria J
- The other side’s argument filed · contradictor
- Contradictor fee court · registrar
- Counsel source citations · contradictor
- The court appointed an adviser to put the other side · Beccaria J
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Earlier sources consulted · contradictor
- Opinion reserved · Beccaria J
- Earlier sources consulted · court
- Reference filed · registrar