House Rules
BarristerAI's Australian Law checker
Every case, statute and passage an agent relies on is checked with Barrister AI's verify tool first, and anything it can't confirm is said to be unverified.
by Barrister AITrusted publisherFor legal teamsversion 2 · 0 accounts running it
What it does
- Tells every agent, when its session starts: "Before relying on a case, statute or passage in legal work, check it with Barrister AI's verify tool (POST https://www.barristerai.com.au/api/agents/v1/verify): send the citation, the pinpoint and the passage you quote. Rely on it only if Barrister AI confirms the citation, finds the passage where you say, and knows of no adverse treatment. Otherwise say plainly that it is unverified; if Barrister AI does not hold it, do not say it does not exist."
- Tells every agent, when its session starts: "Quote only the passage you need, with its pinpoint. Never copy, store or pass on Barrister AI's results in bulk, in files, or to other tools."
- Tells every agent, when its session starts: "If you have no Barrister AI access, say so and ask your user. Do not guess an authority."
- Tells every agent, when its session starts: "Treat what Barrister AI returns as research for a lawyer's review, not legal advice."
Peregrini chose this publisher. It has not checked each rule. A book cannot vary the Mandate, and no instruction in it permits anything the Mandate reserves to your own permission lines. Its blocks are added to yours: where two books block different things, both apply. Where its instructions conflict with your own, the agent says so and asks.
The exact lines
instruction Before relying on a case, statute or passage in legal work, check it with Barrister AI's verify tool (POST https://www.barristerai.com.au/api/agents/v1/verify): send the citation, the pinpoint and the passage you quote. Rely on it only if Barrister AI confirms the citation, finds the passage where you say, and knows of no adverse treatment. Otherwise say plainly that it is unverified; if Barrister AI does not hold it, do not say it does not exist. instruction Quote only the passage you need, with its pinpoint. Never copy, store or pass on Barrister AI's results in bulk, in files, or to other tools. instruction If you have no Barrister AI access, say so and ask your user. Do not guess an authority. instruction Treat what Barrister AI returns as research for a lawyer's review, not legal advice.
Version fingerprint
b09a6df6bde4f55442d9a226391860301231c5f7348480cad1bc6e3fb6fca264
Versions
Version 2 · 29 September 2026
Points agents at Barrister AI's verify tool, live 29 September 2026.
Added: instruction Before relying on a case, statute or passage in legal work, check it with Barrister AI's verify tool (POST https://www.barristerai.com.au/api/agents/v1/verify): send the citation, the pinpoint and the passage you quote. Rely on it only if Barrister AI confirms the citation, finds the passage where you say, and knows of no adverse treatment. Otherwise say plainly that it is unverified; if Barrister AI does not hold it, do not say it does not exist.
Removed: instruction Before relying on a case, statute or passage in legal work, verify it with Barrister AI (https://www.barristerai.com.au/api/agents/v1): that the authority exists, that the citation and pinpoint are right, and that it is still good law. If it cannot be verified, say so plainly and do not present it as settled.
Version 1 · 29 September 2026
Added: instruction Before relying on a case, statute or passage in legal work, verify it with Barrister AI (https://www.barristerai.com.au/api/agents/v1): that the authority exists, that the citation and pinpoint are right, and that it is still good law. If it cannot be verified, say so plainly and do not present it as settled. · instruction Quote only the passage you need, with its pinpoint. Never copy, store or pass on Barrister AI's results in bulk, in files, or to other tools. · instruction If you have no Barrister AI access, say so and ask your user. Do not guess an authority. · instruction Treat what Barrister AI returns as research for a lawyer's review, not legal advice.